L’Alliance de l’Avenir is winning
Trends at this moment show that the Alliance de l’Avenir is winning… relatively comfortably. They are winning 3-0 in most of the constituencies which are predominantly red (No 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 = 10 constituencies). On the other hand, the Alliance du Coeur is winning 3-0 in 4 constituencies: No 1, 17, 19, 20.
Very surprisingly, Port-Louis is divided. In No 2, right now, the Alliance de l’Avenir is winning 2-1 and in No 4, the Alliance du Coeur is winning 2-1. In No 3, Cehl Meeah is at 3rd position just after one candidate from each of the two major alliances.
So, at 13:42 today, the Alliance de l’Avenir has 40 seats, the Alliance du Coeur has 19 seats and Cehl Meeah is 3rd in No 3.
Of course, there are still a lot of ballots to count and results can still change very quickly. But, as far as I can (fore)see, Navin Ramgoolam will be the next Prime Minister and will be in a strong position in the National Assembly…
I’m fed up with the MBC and it’s abysmal coverage of the counting. Showing tables after tables of data without doing any analysis and synthesis is not very useful. We are in 2010 and, by now, the national TV should be in a position to give us insights of what is happening without us having to calculate everything by ourselves. The private radios are faring better but they also are submerged with faxes (I can imagine poor secretaries re-typing everything. Why don’t the electoral commission send emails!?!)
Yes felicitations au BBR pour leur victoire
Le MMM sera une bonne opposition. Nou ena zot manifeste ek nou pou veille au grain 
Bravo, @Bruno
I am frantically trying to have live election results from outside Mauritius. So far all radios are jammed. Thank you elections.mu.
True, Avinash, MaBC is frustratingly hopeless. This is something I have noted ever since 1979…Time to correct that.
I had a feeling that Alliance de l’Avenir would win. It is leading in the countdown so far. I was expecting a 45/15 in favour of the Alliance de l”avenir, not expecting Cehl’s ‘coupe tranche. MMM is doing a good job and in some constituencies it will be a narrow victory for whichever candidate wins. Elections have been carried out in good spirit – none of the expected violence – thanks to the police mostly. It is a job well done. The low turnout could have played against BBR. One word about MSM+PTR. The so-called 4% of MSM vote must have made a difference.
Now back to work, Mauritius.
@Vishesh. Like you, I think that MSM represents more than 4%. I am listening to Radio Plus right now and someone just said that he believe MSM added around 2000 votes in some important constituencies… which is substantial.
what happened to party malin….mURITIANS DONT KNOW HOW TO VOTE IT WAs time for a change….come on MMM
Tanto nou pou conner si demain conger a Maurice.
@avinash
Non je ne partage pas vote analyse. Il semblerait que les MSM n’ont vote que pour le candidat MSM (ils sont en tete dans chaque circonscriptions present)
@Bruno
Moi, personellement, je ne sais pas quelle a été la contribution du MSM. Mais c’est clair que son électorat est plus conséquent que annoncé. Ce qui explique peut etre les 18 sièges?
Mo kapow dir ,dipi never dimatin mone alime mo komputer lor Le Matinal web,perna okaine la gazette dan moris kapow met tou bane moricyen endeor payi Live Direct lor resilta eleksyon.Mo remerci lekipe LM pou so zefor ki li pe fer pou nou.Merci enkor LM:
BBR semble avoir remporté au moins 37 sièges d’ici la fin du counting!!!Je pense que l’alliance du coeur peut espérer finir avec 22 sièges et 1 au FCM de Cehl Meeah!!!
Je suis déçu par Port-Louis et QB car je m’attendais plus à une vague de marée mauve sur les 4 villes que sont QB, BBRH, PL et Cpe!!!!
Dommage pour Vishnu dans le sud et Vijay Makhan à QB!!!!
Attendons la fin du counting pour se fixer sur la composition de la nouvelle assemblée générale!!!Comme l’a dit Bruno, on aura pour les 5 années à venir une belle opposition!!!
Et c’est sûr que les élus du MMM veilleront au grain!!!
Vivement les municipales où la tendance sera inversée et je garantit une prise de pouvoir à BBRH, PL et Cpe!!!!Il faudra continuer à bosser dur pour Vac/Pho et QB…
lol @ Fadil… comment p aller mo croire demain congé public meme!
I am saddened by the whole political scene which clearly at this stage does not reflect any meaningful changes on the previous elections. It does not bode well for the supposed Avenir of the country. As an example I can only see the usual suspects of ministers throwing their weight about beyond their jurisdiction of directly giving employment rights to the usual incompetents, running roughshod over police authaurity and marching hand in hand with socio – culturel groups meddling in politics.
OMG!!!!!!!!!!!! WTF WTF WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I feel for all the Mauritians out there who will be living the next five years like MUSHROOMS!!!!!!!! Mauritius needs new blood, young open minded people to take it to the next level!!!!!!! the old farts need to be kicked out!!!!! if the government is so great, i.e. MSM I wonder then why Mauritians want to leave their country for a better life in Europe, Australia, America and Canada!!!!!!!! I wonder why the young people who go to study abroad prefer to work their ass in order not to return to their own country!!!!!! I would love to see if someone can answer that question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
My humble opinion: As a self-proclaimed chess player and as advised, Navin chose the MSM as a sparring partner with more subtle influence on the Hindu voters in the same way as he chose Rashid Beebeejaun and Xavier, i.e to win the confidence of specific segments of the population. Voters asked themselves the question as to which side best guarantees their future well-being and that of their children and it seems BBR was the answer. Going with the MMM, though a sure victory, would have meant long-term conflict and the possible demise of PTR, reborn from its ashes when Navin showed up. The PTR, one should remember, was cast as a party good for ‘les poubelles de l’histoire’. It was going down the drain with the political despots of that time who were running the affairs of the country as if it was their own property. The MSM has a new history and, as such, it is perceived as youthful. It has a bright future too. There’s no rivalry between MSM and PTR, only just the natural differences between partners.
Mo croire qui banne mauricien pas conne voté. Zotte va plaigné encore longtemps. Anou acheté la plage et mette explosif dans nou lagons. Et MMM pas finne conne rode so candidats pou elections. Pas finne assez dire qui zotte pou faire au lieu critique so opposants. Dire qui zotte pou faire. Et puis qui l’importance and Sénat dans Maurice. Reveille toi Paul. Politique to bizin changé.. qui Subutex? Dire qui to pou faire pou ca banne piti pauvre qui pé casse lé dos ek so sac quand li alle l’école? qui to pou faire pou Chagos? Qui to pou faire pou banne planteurs? Qui to pou faire pou banne pécheurs, qui to pou faire pou qui plus riche na pas vinne plus riche et qui banne pauvre pas vinne encore plus pauvre? Qui to pou faire pou banne employés gouvernement qui pas pé gagne promotion à coze li pas ena backing? Qui to pou vaire pou la Police? Arrete coze communalisme et cozé couma to pou redresse Air Mauritius? Qui to pou faire pou banne dimoune dans la campagne?
@Metisse I understand you are sad if you are a pro-MMM. But, you know, as one who chose to return to Mauritius after my studies and work here, I want to tell you that not everything is bad in Mauritius.
At least, we are free and those who want to contribute positively can do it without fear. Of course, nothing is perfect but I sincerely believe we live in a great little independent country
Remember, “la critique est aisée mais l’art est difficile…”
Fed up with the same scenario. Fukin same old same… Another 5 yrs of Tamassa. I cant work hard send my money to Mtius and then get taxed for my savings, Fukn ashls, Its a shame.
Li pas marcher Pitin…lolol. Nice prime minister.
@Avinash: I am neither MMM nor MSM!!!!! It’s great to hear that you returned to Mauritius after your studies however what we need is for a true leader to return to the country and to start a movement for change. It would be even better if the leader is a woman and not some institutionalise testosterone fuelled male who likes belonging to the old boys club!!!!! Mauritius needs a change if only there was a group of women out there courageous enough to take the step!!! May be I will start one ready for the next election!!!! Female domination sounds good to me!!!!!
@Avinash what you are saying, fortunately, does not depend on who is at the head of our Government. It’s due to all the work done by whoever has ruled since the the Independence.
Thankfully, each and everyone who sat as Prime Minister has contributed, even if the smallest possible, to the making of our country as it is now. What lies ahead now, is to get that contribution being better. Whatever the political party or alliance sitting in the Government, the population can’t sit around and lay the country’s destiny in the hands of a few.
It will get better only when the voting habits of the population changes.
Mauritius, indeed the pearl of the Indian Ocean, Island of Rainbows which God created even before creating Paradise…it is a country where one can potentially live much better that elsewhere at most levels. It has a thriving economy with a democratic system of government that is the envy of most countries which is way, way beter than that of Africa, for instance. However sad it appears that some ‘valuable’ candidates got beaten, this election is giving another group, women, an opportunity to voice their opinons, not to mention take decisions at the highest realms of the country. Paul somehow attained his objectives, being excelent as a leader of the opposition.
Avi, moi aussi je suis les news sur ton blog.
A l’heure qu’il est, on en est toujours aux mêmes pronostiques ?
C’est vers quelle heure que vous connaîtrez les résultats finaux ? Bientôt la fin du counting des votes ?
Désolée pour toutes mes questions, je ne suis pas du tout au courant de ce qui se passe à Maurice actuellement.
Mon pronostic etait presque parfait…
Concernant les 4% du MSM, ca represente une difference de 8% entre BBR et le MMM…. le MSM a contribue au resultats records dans les ciconscriptions rurales…
@ all MMM supporters… b less mo dire zot, ki la population ine decider..pas vine dire pane kone voter, pas vine dire MBC ine fausse le jeu(sadc pas du meme avis), pas vine dire la vie difficile…akoz la majoriter dimounes dans bien( moins tax, job, etc)
Aussi, je suis content du nombre d’elus feminines..j’espere qu’Aline Wong et Stephanie Anquetil seront nommees comme best loser!!
41-18-1!!
La democratie mauricienne est bien vivante!!! Le FSM a un siege…
Résultats (plus ou moins) officiels:
Alliance de l’Avenir: 41 élus
Alliance du Coeur: 18 élus
+ Cehl Meeah au No 3
Fait marquant: 10 élus de la gente féminine. Au moins pou éna moins “la qué lé rat”, “batchara”, “tombe dehors” au Parlement asterla
La population ine donne sa message… nou pas ler prostituees politiques… Ramjuttun, Dulloo, Harish Boodhoo, Lutchmeenaraidoo,… OUT for ever!!
@BBR. Congé demain ???
5 a 14…circonscriptions rurales…. 1 seul deputé du MMM
Je ne partage pas votre optimiste. Ces fleurs de notre jargon parlementaire ont la peau dure. Enfin! Pour certains, les 5 prochaines années seront très longue.
J’avais pronostiqué 40-20, Cehl Meeah est un invité intéressant pour les observateurs politiques.
Au moins les bonnes réformes ne seront pas releguées aux oubliettes. Sinon, les promesses faites devront être tenues. Le peuple les a lues, entendues. Les vrais chiens de garde devront cesser de se contenter d’aboyer, parce que nous ne sommes plus au moyen âge. Malgré les couronnes de fleurs et autres, ces messieurs travailleront pour nous, et pas le contraire. Au-delà des victoires/défaites, c’est cette pensée qui doit nous animer.
Maurice, mon île chérie, que tes enfants ne te déçoivent pas, les plus grands surtout!
The final result is more or less the one we were expecting. That said there are some observations that should be taken into consideration from the results 1) Declining number of voters – it would be interesting to have an in depth analysis of the age group of our voters as i have the feeling that a lot of the young voters have decided not to exercise their right to vote 2) The voting trend of Mauritius is changing – emergence of women votes – women candidates and a relatively small political party (that in itself will be another debate)3) some constituencies are well anchored into traditions (remember my comment as to whether all Mauritians are ready to accept drastic changes) The Avenir Alliance won all seats in rural areas – wonder on which basis
I enjoyed the comments made by Amedee Darga on tele today where he observed that Mauritius is in a period of transition and that the political dynamics of Mauritius will change in 2015. He reckons that the young voters will vote differently and will have either the emergence of a new political party or the younger generation taking over the existing major political parties. I think that this is a fair observation and we are already in for more surprises at the next poll.
Finally Avi is right when he claims that Mauritius is not that bad at all. I have myself seen both side of the coin having done my studies abroad but there’s nothing like home . . . and there’s nothing like Mauritius. Whatever happens coup tete mo vini moi mo contan mo moris. . . ALLEZ MORIS
@Avinash: hey your comments are so sexist. Here we have two women, Palin and Bachman and they are the ones who stir up the racial hatred and violence. Fact that there are more women does not mean that there will be less shenanigans.
Hello Avinash,
What is the distribution of elected within the coallition ‘Alliance de l’Avenir’ (Ptr vs MSM vs PMSD)? Do you know?
@Faisal As far as I know, PMSD = 2, MSM around 12 and the rest PTr. I’ll verify.
@Shak Alé Maurice! De toute façon, bizin manze ar li
Congé dans tous les ecoles kot ine faire counting… enfin mo croire… lol..
PTR 27 77% elected candidates
MMM 18 30% elected candidates
MSM 12 66% elected candidates
PMSD 2 28% elected candidates
MR 2 100% elected candidates
FSM 1 ??% elected candidate
@B-B-R 77% for PTr and 66% for MSM compared to 30% for MMM. That’s revealing… even though, in terms of votes, the two alliances were not very far from each other. I think our electoral system needs a dose of proportionality.
PTR: 49% voix -> 40 depité
MMM: 42% voix -> 19 depité
v dire, 51% in vote contre PTR, system electonal dan Maurice bizin revoir, mais mo penC nou kav res atan.
After the result and the press conference, I believe that Hons Mr Ramgoolam has indeed learn from the past. I’ve been following his progress since he first started politics and I believe he is a quick learner. Congratulation to him and his winning formula and long live our unity and social stability.
Now that the election is over, I think we, on this forum, should still share our ideas about contributing to the development of Mauritius. Who knows may be we can inspire people to think differently and slowly but surely create a forum for positive debate which can guide the leaders to make Mauritius progress further.
Thanks Avinash and Christina for setting up this forum so that we can shared our opinions. Thanks to all for contributing also.
Now it’s time for looking forward.
Chers tous,
L’Avenir a gagné par 41 à 18. Un bref regard sur les emissions politiques:
La MBC n’a pas démérité en permettant, grâce à ces émissions, aux petits partis d’apporter leur contribution majeure à cette campagne.
1° Le FSM a réussi à convaincre une circonscription que c’était capital d’envoyer un de ses membres au moins à l’assemblée. Il a même demandé au peuple de ne pas envoyer les deux jugnauth à l’assemblée. Le peuple l’a écouté.
2° Le leader du Parti Malin a réussi à souligner à quel point c’était facile de promettre monts et merveilles, comme un fou, surtout quand on sait qu’on ne formera pas le prochain gouvernement. Bien qu’il ait égratigné les deux blocs, c’est le MMM qui a dû prendre un grand revers. Il a permis aux jeunes de voir que parole donnée n’est pas forcément parole sacrée.(d’où la grande abstention des jeunes ! ? ! )
3° Le MDN a démontré à quel point on n’est pas entendu quand on est petit, même si parfois on dit vrai.
4° Quelques autres leaders sont venus s’apitoyer sur notre sort, mais on n’a pas voulu d’eux. En l’absence de programme sérieux, le peuple accepte de voir les gens ridicules qui nous font rire mais pas des sérieux qui nous font pleurer.
Oh Non, !
Merci MBC.
Euh it seems to be:
PTr 25 MSM 14 PMSD 2 MMM 17 MMSD 1 FSM 1
The only 4 MSM candidates to have “fallen” are Grenade, 1 in no 3, Dwarkasingh and Hurreeram. Is this correct?
Les résultats de cette élection sont sans surprise. J’avais prévu l’Avenir au moins avec 40 sièges (en étant au Canada!), alors que des amis au pays me disaient que la joute allait être serré. Ces résultats amènent 2 constats:
1) La configuration n’a pas radicalement changé depuis 2005. L’Alliance du Coeur a 4 sièges en moins, mais en 2010 le MMM était en alliance avec le MSM. Dans le fond il passe de 12 à 16 élus. L’Alliance de l’Avenir passe de 38 à 41 élus, sauf qu’il y a 12 élus MSM. Il est donc un peu à la merci de son allié.
2) Le vote ethnique est plus vivant que jamais. Les hindous v/s les créoles, avec les musulmans votant, grosso modo, 50/50.
Le grand gagnant de cette élection est bien Pravind et le MSM. 12 élus pour disons 5-8% de l’électorat!
Lastly, I agree with you guys: there’s nothing our home country!
Avi, do you the percentage of the 2 Alliances (in terms of votes and not seats)?
@gigi Wait for my next article
By the way, I welcome articles from contributors too. Elections.mu will not stop now that the elections are over. In fact, now things become more interesting from the perspective of citizen journalism.
Bannes camarades… le voix populaire pena oken importance dans Mauricepou attribuer sieges dans parlement!! Le systeme ici a Maurice ine faire pou donne ene majoriter comfortable a nimporte ki alliance ki gagner, pou kapav rule dans sereniter… Bannes calculs simplistiques comme 50% BBR, 42%MMM…sa pena importance…bizin analyser circonscription par circonscription…
Pou moi, Navin ene fin stratege… line gagner dans tous les 3 scenarios possibles..line gagner seul contre mmm-msm, avec le mmm et dans l’alliance bbr…
Paul ti envie reedite l’exploit du Ptr en 2005, mais les Boodhoo, Ramjuttun, Dulloo, Uteem, Gregoire pane fer le poids..au contraire sa ine fer ene contre-effet; la population ine regroupe li autour de Navin sans ki line demande nous fer li…
L’autre coté, les soidisant king-makers comme Harish Boodhoo, Cassam Uteem, Gregoire, Lutmeenaraidoo et Ramjuttun sont retournés dans la poubelle…pour de bon j’espere!
Lol @B-B-R calculs simplistiques, oui, mais ena limportance. Li demontrer ki ena buku dimoun ki pa dakor avek ceki p ariver. Mais mo respecT ki PTr in gagne majoriter et MMM pan fer assez pendant 5 ans pou expect vin o pouvoir dan 1 mois. Ceki mo p dir li pa representatif du peuple.
Mo content ki elections.mu p continier, pou ena 1 site de debat lor politik Maurice (surtou pou ban jeunes). Aster ki tou calme mo pli interesser discuss, ki dan presipitation de ces dernieres semaines, kot mo remarker ena buku dimoune motiV par kas election o lieu ki ban vrai convictions.
Et si nou atan “fin stratege” disoude parlement dan sok, fer aliance ek dne programme 1 semaine avan election, pa pou ena 1 democraci avek debat.
C’est ca le probleme a Maurice. Les leaders sont plutot des stateges politique et non pas des chef pour le peuple. Navin et Paul sont pareille, des strateges. Cette fois-ci, c’est Ramgoolam ki a gagne.
Regardant le suffrage, c’est une autre histoire. La constitution doit changer un peu. Apres-tout, on discute deja de changer la constitution de la Grande-Bretagne.
@B-B-R So, the gallery at bleublancrouge www will never be updated
@ gigi
The overall configuration has not changed greatly. Interesting to take the following into accounnt:
1) you can always find reasons to be dissatisfied with the ruling party (in other words,opposition goes with an advantage (4-8)%.
2) It is very hard to beat an alliance. If there was a good MSM/MMM coalition, they would have probably beaten PTR (after all the scandals). In this case MSM 4% would have contributed to at least 20 seats! Instead they chose to fight each other since their defeat. Cf alliances in England, Germany,…
3)When you look closely at individual results, presence in a constituency is very important (Alan Gannoo, Joe Lejonsgard, Mireille Martin, Francoise Labelle, etc…). You may choose to associate it to ethnic considerations but look closer.
3)Lesson to some leaders: being a ‘rassembleur’ against being a ‘diviseur’ always pay. Mauritius has always been known for its political stability.
So whatever the results, good to feel mauritian living in Mauritius
@veeren
You’re right. One of the most interesting aspects of the 2010 elections is that a lot of the “candidats de proximité” were elected.
For instance, in #18 Quatre-Bornes, Kavi Ramano, who is not well known outside the town but who is highly regarded by the locals, came out 2nd well above Vijay Makand (who a lot of people thought stood an excellent chance because of his track record.)
Comme quoi…
@Kervin… mmm ine gagn 42%, bbr ine gagn 51%…alors li toujours kumsa… tous les temps pourcentage la tourne autour de 48-46… c’est pas premiere fois ki ena ene pourcentage kumsa… kapav dire tou les temps meme pourcentage la tourne autour sa chiffre la…
@B-B-R
Li incontestable ki Navin finn gagner dans n’importe ki configuration. Mais eski resultat la li represent l’electorat equitablement (votes BBR/Coeur 49%/41% mais representation BBR/Coeur 68%/32%) ? Theoriquement, enn bon l’opposition fer enn government dirige en faveur du peuple. En pratique li peut-etre quelquechose d’autre a Maurice.
C’est plutot enn debat pour l’avenir au lieu enn ki pe conteste resultat. Plutot enn debas constructive de la part de tous le monde.
@Faisal… Maurice, li pas comme ca… 51/42 pas necessairement veut dire bizin donne meme quantite siege a ene parti… par exemple dans US, c’est pas pourcentage globale qui determine le President, mais bizin guette les chiffres d’etat en etat…
@ Veeren
I totally agree with points 1, 2 and 4. Regarding point 3, although “candidats de proximité” can put their weight in the balance on occasions, I still think that people vote for their party or the PM they want before anything else. Apart from the general population and the tamil, PRB will never be accepted as the PM of this country, simply because he has made too many mistakes during his carrer. Even if he is probably not a “diviseur”, his political tactics are perceived as such. Surrounding himself by a few has-been politicians was not a bright idea either. I am happy that MMM has not been wiped out, because we need an opposition in the country. They now have to re-think their strategy and probably find a new charismatic leader to become a national party, which they have ceased to be. It is good for democracy to have an alternative.
@B-B-R
Mo knr li pas cumsa a Maurice. Mais eski li ti pu mieux? Problem ki in arrive en Angleterre avec un tel system ki nou ena a Maurice:
Conservative – 29% of votes – 242 seats
Lib Dems – 23% of votes – 52 seats
Mo pense ki system courant li pas vraiment faire. Peut-etre ki fer nu still tann bucu dimoune plaigner a Maurice. C’est juste un debat – discuss.
@Faisal
Mo pan etudier ban different electoral system, mais mo kwar US si un peu pareil pou presidential election. Sa deux system la gagne assez critik osi dan ban election selment.
Maurice bien tipti comparer avek US ou UK, 1 etat kav p represente Maurice en entire ou buku plis enkor.
Sois ti kav fer best loser corige ban problem system la et non corrize communoter, ou alor dramaticment fer 1 election o nivo national pou premier minitre ou president.
@Kervin
Good start
Mo ti pe pense in peu comme ca mwa ossi. Apres tous mo pense ki bann communote bien represente dans bann elu deja ek bann elu ou best losers (ki musulman, hindu, creole, sinoi…) zot pas represent zot communote, zot represent zot parti.
Mo pas ti pu ale vers ene election pu 1 premier ministe mais plutot ene system counting ki pu mieux distribuer bann votes.
Dans context moris enna enn lot problem si nou fer enn system comme sa. Ena bann politicien ‘roder bout’ ki content sanz kan. Sa kapav affecter parlement. Eski lerla nou bizin met enn certain restriction lor sa bann la? Li pas vraiment dans l’interet bann morissien. – juste to make the debat more interesting.
Si nous continier dan sa penC ki bizin fer 1 election pli “fair”. Li vrai ki bizin regule ban politiciens, ena tro buku kitchoze ki zot fer et pa normal.
Pou moi ena 1 kestion crucial. Qu’est ki ban parti politik a Maurice c’est ban parti democratik ou simplement ban dictatures?
Mo p kose internally dan 1 parti. Akoz pena election dan ban parti pou elir so leader, c’est de pere en fils. Mo kwar c’est la start problem derive ban politiciens.
Si ti ena election dan parti la pa ti pou ena nirport quoi et de lautre cote ena 2eme problem comunoter dan election. Sa 2 issues la, de mo lavie enpaisse nou election roule normalment.
Kuma resolve zot, sa 1 lot kitchoze…
En fait @Kervin, nou encore dans ene système oligarchique. Mais bon, en principe, chaque oligarchie vine ene vrai démocratie à la fin
Le probleme c’est ki sa ban parti la enna boucoup resource ek cass. A moris nu pena confiance avec bann lezot parti parski parmi sa bann parti la enna ki propoz bann solution ridicule. Alors par defaut, meme si enna en ti parti ki propoz bann bon zafaire, nou pas pou vote zot. Malheureusement, mo bizin admet ki mo pa inn encore trouve sa parti la
. Apres, li coute cass pu roule enn parti politique – campagne, resource….
Mais mo pense ki internet/sociale media li peut-etre pou capav evoluer nous system – pas en sanzant nu constitution mais pluto pu edik plis dimoune ek permet debat. Ti pu bon si ban antropologue contribuer.
Leave your response!
Archives
Blogroll
Latest Comments
Most Commented
Most Viewed